I am a centrist and a conservative and judge people only on their ideas and Buffett has no original ones where I do.
We have in common that in both cases we learned from Ben Graham but took entirely different paths, I have less money but my returns to date are better than both of them.
Time will tell if I continue or blow up but I have rational reasons to believe I will continue or improve.
It's just to me centrist is between Kropotkin and Adam Smith and they aren't very far apart actually.
I find Buffett's anecdotes amusing like baseball no strikes my point is that I ignore him because despite his money I have decided he is a worthless human being.
Its ironic that you would criticise me for not following Buffett then call me an ideologue. http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle...en-buffetts-mobile-home-empire-clayton-homes/
You won't find any anarchist-inclined ideologues, more I haven't said I was an anarchist or that I thought an ideal political system could be defined.
Or that if it were possible such an idea would be socially useful.
As i have said it's the most apparently noble system yet devised and anyone who has really considered the problem will come to the same view.
My opinions are very complex and nuanced and can't be expressed in one out of context aspect.
The centrist as you put it is one which thinks the poor should get social welfare, the rich corporations should control the government and monopolize the economy.
Someone that has that argument is a long way behind my thinking to the point we have no common ground.
I tire of explaining, I am not offended you are just wrong and I just don't care overly much about that.
Have an awesome day though, cheers for the stuff posted on SHJ
SHJ Price at posting:
66.0¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
(20min delay)
