That maybe so but you are presuming that buying at $3 was a...

That maybe so but you are presuming that buying at $3 was a "mistake" and that was due to a flaw in the analysis which perhaps could have been corrected. Furthermore that you or I are in a position to judge with the 20/20 vision of hindsight.
I am saying that if there was a mistake it applies to most conventional analysis and not an error of an individual but a problem with how "investors" in general approach the question with a head full of bias and misconceptions. It wasn't one person bidding the price up to $3 it was a whole @#/#^&g market and so the question is then why was the whole market so wrong in its valuation.
& just because the price was $3 and is now $.7 doesn't mean anything in and of itself, the shareprice is meaningless.
I certainly didn't predict the WIP impairments or the fall of SGH, we know that was the main thing driving market perceptions.
So I can't fault anyone else's judgement for not forseeing that either.
Is there something else you think they could tell us now, assuming the reasons for the decision can be remembered without a little acrimony.
P.S anarchists kick ass capitalists suck.
I just don't know how you guys can distort the facts to your fit your crazy belief system. The fact that you guys are completely useless at investing is no surprise as you cleaely haven't learned to use your brains.
But then I am not the one following y'all around, I have nothing to learn from you. I have judged you and found you wanting.
It's pathetic how weak you are as competition so docile, it's like kicking a puppy except y'all are just intellectually defenseless not cute - real sick evil *os who stop at nothing to destroy the planet's ecosystem and enslave it's people.