@freeheel I thought there was a higher grade, thicker section...

@freeheel

I thought there was a higher grade, thicker section that was running at a different angle headed towards where they drilled DDH49-51. So DDH33 & 34 were disappointing to me in that respect. DDH35 was a little low for me, DDH36 was fine.

Given DDH21 & 23 RC, I was expecting much better from DDH37.

You've lost a lot of ground in that SW corner now that was extending the size of the deposit.

I'd question (depending on what any further holes to the West of like DDH21 find) whether it is worth attempting open pit mining, more likely with those thicknesses & depth that they would be looking to use underground mine West of the fault line that's shown.

Time will tell.

I was looking for the number to be around 500 - 550,000 T of Cu for T3 so to now be looking in the 350 - 400,000 projected range is a bit disappointing for me personally. I'm sure others have there own views on it.

LOTM