@eshmun Hi esh. As you know I keep an eye on you too as I very...

@eshmun
Hi esh.
As you know I keep an eye on you too as I very much value your input.
Sometimes your intellectual explanation is a bit above the kiss method for me.
So without trying to be disrespectful I want try to understand this a bit more.
I am not sure what you mean by your statement,
"Actually I think this is the wrong interpretation. The current extents of the Rupice deposit don’t follow the IP. The deposit strikes off to the north from the IP anomaly." ( down plunge? )
I can see that the drill holes are not lined up with the IP anomaly but the marker label of the Rupice deposit on the pic is also not lined up with the previous drilling so I assumed this to be a misalignment of overlay maps.
At the bottom of your post you have copied an excerpt which I found conflicting to your first statement.
"The anomaly extends over a strike length of +600m and remains open to the northwest, with current drilling only covering nominally 17% of that strike length.”

That is how I made my assumption along with this from a very recent nr.
OVERVIEW
Drill hole BR-10-18 intercepted two mineralised zones with the lower zone being of high-grade mineralisation from 236m downhole depth, over a thickness of 28m. This intercept is located some 140m down-dip from historical drill hole BR-79-89 and interpreted to lie on the west side of the high-grade plunge mineralisation intersected by BR-5-18, located some 30m to the east.
The reason for my attention to this is to understand that the IP has actually picked up not only the anomaly now known as Rupice and what else maybe in the new concession rather than discuss the accuracy of the maps I would rather discuss the accuracy of the IP interpretation of the anomaly.
I am always interested in your expertise esh so please take this as a clarification and not an argument.
It is also nice to consider this inclusion "with current drilling only covering nominally 17% of that strike length.”
I hope that interpretation is accurate.
Kind regards, Wack.