Not likely VMS. More likely structural host like Eloise.
2 conductive plates identified - might be more to do with mineral zoning than any distinctly separate host environments. I.e chalcopyrite at higher RL = more conductive, versus non-conductive sphalerite and calcite components enriched at depth.
Not exactly what one might have hoped for the second hole here. Next hole to target the most conductive response from plate 2. Could be due to +pyrrhotite, -sphalerite in that section, or hopefully for punters sake, something more like the first hole. I'd put my money on the former, but be happy to be wrong. There is another lead zinc occurrence to the south, so this sulphide assemblage is not alien to this structural terrain.
IMO, this one was expected to be an unpredictable wait and see for the following holes before running down to the Ferrari dealership. That sentiment is somewhat validated.
GLTA
MEP Price at posting:
22.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held