Actual figures? Why bother? If you could see two different futures for IFL (say over 3 years), would you prefer to invest in the one that will have a 10% annual rate of FUM accretion through enticing dealer groups, and 0% organic net flows, or the one that will have a 0% rate of accretion through dealer groups and 10% organic?
I'm obviously referring to the metric being not bad, not to the disclosure. Do you have trouble with context sometimes, or do you just like Socratic arguments?
Ann: FUMAS for period ended 30 June 2018 and ANZ Wealth update, page-23
Add IFL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$3.14 |
Change
0.010(0.32%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.703B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $3.13 | $3.18 | $3.10 | $4.755M | 1.511M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 16014 | $3.13 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $3.17 | 27892 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 29/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| IFL (ASX) Chart |
