Originally posted by Marketinfo
prawn_man,
Sorry I didn't do that post as well as I could have ......................... I find this new HC a bit tedious and far too busy for my liking.
So DIGS is at this address:
http://digsopen.minerals.nsw.gov.au/
Then put the GS2018/0371 in the search field of the "New DIGS" option ( for some unknown reason it had the may 2018 as part of it when or after I posted it.
I haven't finished reading so I will get back with my opinion probably at the end of the weekend.
Just one thing though, the Copper Blow main IOCG body dose not appear to have vertical mineralised shoots ......... so when they drill further down (as in straight underneath) they tend to miss what was right above (as in higher grades) as it would appear from all the drilling that the shoots dip to the Left with in the body of the structure when you are looking to the East / North Eastern direction on the sketches and diagrams.
Thus I'm only guessing but hole #71 would appear to have only skirted or even missed the better grades above it. It perhaps would have been better placed further south to catch the extension of the mineralisation above.
As for the SE Anomaly, hole #72 gives something to work on for the stratigraphic setting that exists in and around that hole.
Will be interested to see if they test for PGE's and REE's as well as the normal assays they do for the usual suspects.
Also wonder if they will do down hole surveys.
MI
@prawn_man
Correction:
".... as it would appear from all the drilling that the shoots dip to the Left with in the body of the structure when you are looking to the East / North Eastern direction on the sketches and diagrams."
I should have said when you look "North / North West".
MI