Bwahahah , stop looking its in-front of you... you know where it...

Bwahahah , stop looking its in-front of you... you know where it is , there and there and there , and there and there, I did not say more drilling is not better, but I emphasised the more we know the better feasibility estimates for recovery.
Density distances still gave a good indication as to where further higher density deposits may be located.
Bear in mind that the drilling further out was also done with some geological estimates by experts in the field, and their considerations, and assisted in confirmation of their overall sentiment and suspicions.
Where the sentiment was greater you would find a higher density of the drill targets to confirm "calculated" suspicions.. Sparser drilling was to assist with drawing better assumptions and confirm whether further exploration would be required. I find that if there are further drilling for exploration programmes for infill sites there must be a very valid geological argument to compliment the new suspicion. Time will tell but the Infill drilling should in no way affect the mobilisation of the confirmed site locations for plant setup. All IMO And when I get the lotto you know where I will be buying shares