When you look at the facts only, that is to say, if you look at...

When you look at the facts only, that is to say, if you look at ASIC only documents.
The 2 companies were placed into VA on 24/12/2014
You can see that a company called 333d was first registered on the 7/1/2015.
14/1/2015 A notice went out to shareholders advising that expressions of interest were advertised in 2 newspapers on the 10/1/2015.
Expressions of interest closed 16/1/2015.
Final offer for purchase of business and assets 23/1/2015.
Shortly after a DOCA was proposed by the administrator naming 333d as the proponent of the DOCA.
You can see that Jason is not on the 333d share registry.
You can also see that Jason is not a director nor does he have any involvement in the new company.

You can see that OZB advertised the 333d deal on their web page on 16/1/2015.

Horse, you and others have been told that the other directors got sick of jason so they got rid of him.
They gave you a story claiming that Jason had a mine mine mine attitude. They said that Jason didn't want to drive to a new factory that was in southbank.

Jason posted an email from JC and I quote what JC wrote, "It’s Christmas Day tomorrow, you decide if you want $200k or nothing plus a legal bill of $12k from your lawyer (as per the email you forwarded earlier today)."

Jason also posted a copy of the rejection letter from the admin/creditors trust on his creditor claims that had included his accrued employee entitlements, the rent they were goi9ng to pay a few times but didn't. The phone, power, bin, bill and the rates notice.

333d as proponent still wanted and always wanted to do the RTO of OZB, so much so, they started a creditors trust.
To me, a creditors trust makes a mockery of the creditors rights. We have the money, we just don't want to pay it now. It also shows that the company didn't have an insolvency issue.

There are many documents that Jason has posted on his ART3D facebook page that really raise a lot of questions in my mind.

You have the facts and the definition given by the ATO and ASIC as to what defines a phoenix company from an illegal phoenix company.