"Nice results but 0.3m @ 12,860 is literally more gold than they...

"Nice results but 0.3m @ 12,860 is literally more gold than they are saying is in the entire 4.4m intersection? So is it only a 0.3m hit or are the numbers wrong?"

Good pickup. 

There appears to be a discrepancy between the text and the detailed logs.

Specifically, for hole KDU4623 on the top line of the table on page 17, it indicates 12,860g/t for 0.2m, not 0.3m.

If you use 0.2m instead of 0.3m then the amount of gold in that "included" intersection does indeed work out to be less than the amount in the whole 4.4m intersection as you would expect. 

Did you check out the photo of the core on page 4?

Very impressive.

Cheers