Just in relation to the QA/QC question that you have, the way I read the announcement in conjunction with Table 4 is that the certified value of their standard should be 80.8g/T Au.
From my reading of Table 4, Batch 1 had a standard that returned 84.75g/T Au, Batch 2 had the same standard but returned 53.5g/T Au and Batch 3 had the same standard but that returned 67g/T Au so the same Standard material is returning "assays" that are all over the shop in relation to what the alleged certification value of the Standard is.
No one else has picked up on Table 3 data yet as well, have a close look the eastings and northings in Table 3 of drill holes TERC-001 and TERC-002. I am thinking that they will need to issue a clarification on that as well.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Exploration Update
Just in relation to the QA/QC question that you have, the way I...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 105 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BBX (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
ACW
ACTINOGEN MEDICAL LIMITED
Will Souter, CFO
Will Souter
CFO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online