Ann: Exploration Update, page-33

To be fair though - that article about CZL is pretty old and actually out of date now. CZL have since conducted driling and underground sampling and reported very high Zn and Pb grades without any question marks from the ASX compliance guys..... I encourage any interested people to go over and have a look at the CZL threads and the CZL releases, the geology and nature of mineralization that CZL have is very clear and easy to assay and understand. Sure they might have stuffed around a bit and not gone into production as fast as some would like, but the reasons for that are all discussed on the CZL threads.

I hold CZL and have no doubts about the grades that they have there. I don't hold BBX and have still yet to come to grips with exactly what BBX have or do not have.

Midnight26 and I probably disagree on some things about BBX's sampling and assay protocols/techniques, but thats OK, we are allowed to have different opinions and express them, once I see some compelling assay information about what BBX actually have, then we can resume discussion and possibly convince the ASX compliance guys that we should be allowed to buy and sell BBX shares on the market again...

If Midnght26 is correct and fuure BBX assays confirm extremely high grade gold, then this thing will shoot to the moon (if it ever trades again) and good for Midnight26 if thats the case - he took the early risk and deserves the rewar. If the future BBX results are problematic or unexpectedly low or somehow dubious then my caution will have been well advised. There has been a great discussion between Eshmun and Midnight26 on these BBX threads that makes for interesting and informative reading about the sampling and assay techniques debate surrounding BBX over the last few months.

Anyway - its all academic for us non BBX-holders as we aren't allowed to buy shares at the moment anyway!