Hilarious!
... but I can't let it pass...
There have been extensive discussions in the past about how to model an appropriate MC or EV for ECT. These discussions have been derided or ignored by Satin.in the past.
Foremost is the Arrowhead model of a few years ago which modelled ECT's share of the NPV for the India project at about AUD $110 M.
Since then we have receive information that varies this valuation - the financial info that has been shared about the future commercial plant and RoW exploitation and the LV developments among them.
ST constantly presents an air of being financially informed and uses that to deride the company. You will notice however that there are no numbers in the analyses. The reason is that all valuations are based on assumptions that Satin simply ignores or claims are fanciful.
Now he claims proponents of the company can't answer. No, Satin: people can't be bothered answering your imperious calls when they have seen your past behavior.
Hilarious!... but I can't let it pass...There have been...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ECT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.343M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | $2.255K | 1.127M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 33 | 46309223 | 0.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3¢ | 14909396 | 24 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.25pm 02/12/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ECT (ASX) Chart |
