Ann: Entitlement Issue Prospectus, page-3

OK Q, I've had a gut full. Credit to you for calling out the structural issues over the last 18+ months. But no, you've not been 'right' on many issues, in fact you've been downright wrong.

Countless posts questioning Anglo's involvement and why they would invest anymore in OGX. Yet here we are with them taking up full entitlement in an underwritten rights issue. Why would that be the case Q - care to answer that question? It's relevant and material - just as you keep telling us all to keep the focus on the things that matter - this matters, so please answer.

Countless posts questioning the Baord's ability to raise capital with a fully underwritten cap raise. Yest here we are, they've done it - How is that the case Q, care to answer that question for the 'newbies'? (BTW I can't see too many newbies on these threads, you're sort of a lone scarecrow thinking she has a very important job after harvest time!

You also now state OGX will have trouble raising the $5m from retail mums and dads. I'll call early BS on this statement, and dare say the raise will be oversubscribed -for better or worse, but that will be the case. I'll call you on your wrong call when that happens.

But what really gets my backup is the fact that you only post on OGX, not one other stock on the entire ASX is deemed worthy by you of warning 'newbies' away. Yet, for that entire time you have had a sentiment of none. To my mind that's disingenuous at best and down right misleading at worst. Many of us on here know your real day job and the fact you are not a regular 'retail investor'. There are other motives at foot here for you to play such a long, painful and slow game, yet you deflect and/or ignore all attempts of posters to better understand your motives. It is clear to one and all that you are not here to save 'newbies'.

To the Mods. Is this really acceptable? Thousands of repetitive posts, effectively 'spamming' the OGX boards, if you took out the repetition Q would post 10% of the current volume and that would be very welcome. A sentiment of none? Surely not, ids that allowed? To mislead others on this forum? OF course Q has been right on the majority of calls over the past 18 months, but that does not justify the means.

It is not a simple matter of putting this poster on ignore, for one there is value in the 10% of posts as I have said previously, but then to endure the countless responses to the original, repetitive posts, it adds absolutely nothing to this forum at all.

I think the answer is obvious, but I'll leave it with you good folk to decide.

Cheers, Unc.

PS: I am part of the OGSX Shareholder Action Group, I am not excusing previous management, nor advocating actions of current management / BOD. We are in a dire position, which I highly doubt is recoverable. Time will tell. Best of luck to all who have lost fortunes, families, and their sanity. For those few newbies (if you exist), you don't need me to tell you, never invest more than you can afford to lose.