Ann: Encouraging Developments in Tanzania, page-40

Actually @Trommel I’m referring to a great many posts on several stocks. However it was your posts on the KNL threads that I just find pointless, relentless without variance and shall we be kind and say mischievous. Hence I had a little yawn, which to my amazement, someone, I don’t know who, was too thin skinned to have a laugh and took umbrage. How sad.

Now, I never asserted anything you said was “incorrect” did I? Comments do not have to be incorrect to be described as garbage (trash) I am sure you would understand.

e.g. 1: “the fact KNL management thought the announcement was price sensitive”. Surely you know better than that. ASX decides what is price sensitive. So I’m putting that in the misleading basket.

e.g. 2:“There is no project timeline at all these days in any company presentation. Investors have literally no idea how long project development is expected to take”. As you well know mining projects have been delayed indefinitely in Tz since about a year ago. So if we don’t know when we will start how can we know when we will end? The best piece of info is to show precisely what they have shown and that is the very Timeline to Production that you kindly posted. Why would they need to keep reproducing it when the implications of the new mining laws are unknown. As soon as they get the go ahead then I would expect a revised timeline.

But please don’t let me put you off attempting to discredit the company and its management under the guise of warning readers if that is what gives you your daily kicks. My next picture will be of a parrot.

It won’t matter a toss at the end of the day.