I disagree with the Therapist comment, and dont think that...

I disagree with the Therapist comment, and dont think that should be implied about anyone.

However, I do agree that personal attacks on management serve no purpose. But that constructive criticism, even if harsh, should be leveled at the project, the management, and all parties involved.
Why?
Because Shareholders (although in this case, Satin is not one) should hold Management and the Board to account.
We are not here to be their cheer squad.

So for me personally, as soon as this RCA is signed, I will then go back to hammering them about the Australian side of things (which is overdue already).
And then when that seems on track, hammer them about the Hyrdogen side of things.

Etc etc.

Why? Because this is my investment, and they are employed to realize shareholder value.