Well done, very astute of you shimmer, but considering I did say...

Well done, very astute of you shimmer, but considering I did say at the outset I'm not a holder,  I thought it would have been a forgone conclusion I had no idea about the stock?

Now we are clear, as a non holder I have no idea, what is your counter argument to John Robertson of EIM Capital who made the comments - "Echo Resources is Expensive. Repeat. Expensive." - suggested the stock is overvalued and gives his reasons for thinking so.

Surely you can come up with a bit more than a cute throw away line that has absolutely nothing to do with what Robertson is claiming, or can you?