I think it's interesting to note that from the email...

I think it's interesting to note that from the email correspondencefrom Jeff that the main issue that the ASX Compliance guys had was the nature of the sampling in the field and not necessarily the convoluted sample communities and assay techniques, if I remember the article from the Australian correctly, the analyst quoted was more disparaging of the assay techniques rather than the field sampling details. Note that Jeff says that it was the ASX that asked BBX to go back and resample from the surface with more detailed and specific field sample information e.g. what depth, area, geographic coordinates and what rock types they exactly were sampling.