I also refer readers to this post I made in response to...

First 90 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
eshmun

11,185 Posts.

2609

16/08/18

01:03

Post #: 34965012
Share

Originally posted by eshmun ↑

@digby218

They are estimates based on the information provided in the announcememt about the hole.

There are a number of assumptions I’ve made which I explained in my post if you took time to read it.

They are.

1) the deepest interval is likely to be the highest grade interval as that is the interval the company has displayed photos of the core for.

2) the grade of the deepest interval has been calculated based on using a sub-interval length for the predominant malachite of 0.5m (a bit longer than the actual sub-interval in the photo of 0.33m) and assuming the molecular weight of Cu in malachite (of ~57% Cu) to 100% of that sub-interval (ie some overestimation here) and also assuming the remainder of that interval contains negligible mineralisation ie = zero for this assumption (some underestimation here).

3) that the shallower high grade intervals will have lower grade than what I have calculated for the deepest interval (of 8.23% Cu), these are guesses at 5%Cu each, but guesses based on an estimated upper bound

4) to calculate the grade of the 55m, I’ve used the above grades for the three highest grade intervals and weighted the 55m interval based on each intervals length and grade again assumed that the mineralisation outside of these three higher grade areas is negligible ie =zero for this assumption (an underestimation here).

I’ve then halved and double all these grades to give a range and a preferred range for the Cu grade of the 55m interval.

How you can say my estimates are unresearched guesses is beyond me.

The purpose of these guesses for me is to have some benchmarks to assess the actual assay results against when they are announced. If they exceed my expectations (particularly with any gold that might be assayed) I might consider buying and if they don’t then I’ll hold off for the next results.

That’s how I assess the merits of these announcements. Hopefully you have your own reasrched approach otherwise you are just flying blind. I’ve been in enough of these copper plays to know you don’t win them all even when initial results can look very promising. Esh

Expand

I also refer readers to this post I made in response to @digby218

https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/an...4308066/page-87?post_id=34518862#.W3Q_r8K6ztQ

were I said

"How you can say my estimates are unresearched guesses is beyond me.

The purpose of these guesses for me is to have some benchmarks to assess the actual assay results against when they are announced. If they exceed my expectations (particularly with any gold that might be assayed) I might consider buying and if they don’t then I’ll hold off for the next results.

That’s how I assess the merits of these announcements. Hopefully you have your own reasrched approach otherwise you are just flying blind."

Eshmun

PXX Price at posting: 9.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
2 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Chaos reigns markets – so let's take stock of where we're at ahead of December

SHN

Chimeric clocks $4.17M R&D tax rebate from Canberra

Watchdog takes Webjet to court over alleged 'false' flight prices with hidden fees

PME

Pro Medicus signs landmark $330M deal to roll out imaging platform in US hospitals

WC8

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects

OCN

Southern Cross Gold zooms in on 9 new high-grade zones above 20g/t at Golden Dyke

ACW

This biotech stock raised $11M in a risk-off environment. Its Alzheimer's drug could change the game

History-making uranium sample grades and an imminent drill run. Infini Resources is poised to transform in 2025

MIN

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

MTM

Australian Rare Earths bullish on early-stage uranium potential at Overland, SA

There are more pages in this discussion • 20 more messages in this thread...

First 90 Last

Add PXX (ASX) to my watchlist

(20min delay)
Last 0.8¢		Change 0.001(7.14%)		Mkt cap ! $21.37M

Open	High	Low	Value	Volume
0.8¢	0.8¢	0.8¢	$320	42.64K

Buyers (Bids)

No.	Vol.	Price($)
19	9336073	0.7¢

Sellers (Offers)

Price($)	Vol.	No.
0.8¢	4420618	5

View Market Depth

No.	Vol.	Price($)
6	2726570	0.009
8	2365000	0.008
3	665000	0.007
2	1570000	0.006
2	700000	0.005

Price($)	Vol.	No.
0.010	5962481	3
0.011	799200	4
0.012	1183333	3
0.013	850076	4
0.014	7415000	5

Last trade - 15.46pm 29/11/2024 (20 minute delay)

PXX (ASX) Chart

I also refer readers to this post I made in response to...

Top Stories

Chaos reigns markets – so let's take stock of where we're at ahead of December

Chimeric clocks $4.17M R&D tax rebate from Canberra

Watchdog takes Webjet to court over alleged 'false' flight prices with hidden fees

Pro Medicus signs landmark $330M deal to roll out imaging platform in US hospitals

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects

Southern Cross Gold zooms in on 9 new high-grade zones above 20g/t at Golden Dyke

This biotech stock raised $11M in a risk-off environment. Its Alzheimer's drug could change the game

History-making uranium sample grades and an imminent drill run. Infini Resources is poised to transform in 2025

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

Australian Rare Earths bullish on early-stage uranium potential at Overland, SA

Buyers (Bids)

Sellers (Offers)