Esh is more than welcome IMO. It's healthy for well considered...

Esh is more than welcome IMO. It's healthy for well considered opinions to be presented amongst the HC community. Firstly I would like to point out the magnetic targets sit directly beneath copper, gold and moly anomalies where there isn't any tallus cover. Basically the target southeast of Zackly has no accompanying surface geochemistry because of the tallus cover. All the others are a great fit. The moly is particularly interesting because it is less reactive and tends to be a reliable porphyry vector.

Regarding the visuals table. There is a wide range given for the intervals as the alternative is to present centimetre by centimetre observations which ends up looking quite absurd and off-putting to most announcement readers. I don't think it's a particularly practical requirement by the ASX but it's the first time they've asked for this and I'm sure it will improve with feedback. Of course the proof is going to be in the assays and everyone should be aware of that. I agree with Esh that the gold is very interesting as it has the potential to really boost the grade and project economics.