Quite possibly so Grindstone. Rest assured however I'm not one...

Quite possibly so Grindstone.  Rest assured however I'm not one of them.  I'm a buyer not a seller and my position remains let the assays and professional geologists do the talking.

The company has simply published what its seen to date - cant be fairer than that.  My point for some time has been that "Guessing Grade" via some of the potentially-disingenuous-free-advise 'luminaries' on here is futile at best.

It isn't just all about the visually high grade copper in the latest visuals either. The existing resource contains good gold grade and one could very reasonably expect there to be more of it.  Visual gold is a rarity and good grades are generally invisible to the eye.  It doesn't have to be visible to be good grade.  Assays will soon reveal all.  Guessing won't.  The spatial location of the new drill results in relation to the existing resource will be just as relevant to ultimate economics.    

That said, I'm in it for the big picture - Zackly is merely a symptom of a much bigger picture in my considered opinion which is based on the company's own statements and discussions with other geo's on porphyry systems, skarns and the very real both large and high grade deposits in the same regional geology as PolarX's tenure.

Enough said.