Ann: Disclosure Document - Supplementary Prospectus, page-57

Sector, I'd say that your post is the one that is "twisted" and as is often the case, twisted using selective choice of words and in contexts that suit your criticism. Extremely nasty stuff.
Good, honest and logically considered opinions, from either viewpoint, ARE extremely useful for not only "genuine holders" that you conveniently chose to use, but, to those who may be intending to buy into the company.
Comments and analyses from the likes of cmonaussie, leave no one in doubt about that opinion and provides an excellent source for logical and impartial consideration. Compare that to many of yours and let's not even talk about the crap from most of the other "knockers", the gap between them is like a chasm.
Cmonaussie and his ilk give absolute credibility to why "non holders" should post in forums where they don't have a financial interest. Unlike, many who ape being "non holders" who are clearly just in there to do whatever mischief they can by knocking the company, its management and to denigrate any "positive" posters personally, to try to influence the SP, yes, even in a penny dreadful like AKK, but, where just a .001 change in the SP could mean a 100% profit!!!!
Think about it you posters who keep asking why those so called "non holders" are so persistently spending so much time and energy posing in forums!!!!
And, my comment about the futility of analyzing AKK related to the drawn out discussion on EBITDA!!! It was very good stuff, but, in an AKK forum?? That is still a joke and at least cmonaussie, again, unlike you and others, understood what I was saying.
Roll on flow tests and results of the "PRIORITY' offer (which is now a HUGE priority for management and shareholders) so we can make some real decisions on how long this company has got for its shareholders and punters.