Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

EAR

Click for more information

0.75%

33.3¢ echo resources limited

I usually value 2/3rds MC to NPV for companies in development...

First 17 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Seth Davis

3,349 Posts.

309

09/08/18

11:37

Post #: 34827897
Share

Originally posted by Gwaihir ↑

Someone has been selling down since the BFS, and it looks like a fund or other significant holder. I would like to know who they are, and I expect in time we will see a "ceasing to be a substantial holder" notice.

The figures did not look too bad to me, but there are others here who are more experienced with the financials than I am, and who's opinion I respect, like esh.

Market cap of $90m, and NPV of around $140m - it seems some were hoping the NPV would be double or triple that number.

Given the stats on the project, I'd like to know what a good (or at least reasonable NPV) would have been, one that some of the experienced posters here would consider more reasonable (without being excessive).

For example, would an NPV of $270 (or 3 times the market cap) have been reasonable?

Gw

Expand

I usually value 2/3rds MC to NPV for companies in development phase, I'm a simple punter though hehe.

EAR Price at posting: 17.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

History-making uranium sample grades and an imminent drill run. Infini Resources is poised to transform in 2025

MIN

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

CXM

'Taking money from the market': Garbage giant cleans up as this week's Hot Stock tip

WC8

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects

ACW

This biotech stock raised $11M in a risk-off environment. Its Alzheimer's drug could change the game

There are more pages in this discussion • 132 more messages in this thread...

First 17 Last

Add EAR (ASX) to my watchlist