That's not a bad 2 bob's worth Cb. I wonder if everyone knows what a 'bob' is/was, and also why the saying '2 bob's worth' exists.
Just in case some don't know, a 'bob' was a nickname for the pre-decimal currency shilling which was 1/20th of a pound (2 dollars). 2 bob was of course 2 shillings, or a florin. A quick google as to the derivation of the expression '2 bobs' worth' does not help me though.
Anyway, I agree that an explanation as to why Forrest precedes Wodger is warranted; also why in the prior ann, Wodger (the potential star) was seemingly pigeon-holed and then made important again in the last ann. I don't expect an explanation though, but hopefully from now on the CEO will fill us paying mugs in as per each report.
What we know though is that reprocessing of surface EM at all 3 sites/Forrest/Wodger/Big Billy (as advised by me here - not the company
- done in April this year) has shown new targets at F and BB. I have heard that a different geophysicist looked at it very closely and found something both different and positive. Whether that geoph's report triggered the prioritising is not known.
Is F more promising?
Maybe it's not more promising but the expenditure requirements in respect of the Licence demand spending money before say 1/12. One can never discount licence requirements as the driving force. Just a thought! Use it or lose it!!!
