Yes, I agree. They probably regard Forrest as more likely to yield good results when compared with Wodger- spoilt for choice. I see from the plan showing historical drilling at Forrest that one hole approx 100 meters to the north of the planned hole yielded 9.1 meters at 5.27% Cu which is not to be sneezed at!
Looking at the section I wonder whether they considered re-entering FGDD006? Perhaps that will be on the cards after the current hole.
Yes, I agree. They probably regard Forrest as more likely to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 95 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
