@goodie just on your numbers above, I think those numbers are a little misleading. In late June they traded at $2.08 or so but had a net asset value of $1.84. Those that paid the big premium to NTA have paid the price.
A dividend was then paid in July of 21c and that is not in your numbers. I think a fairer representation would be $1.84 less .21 = $1.63 compared to a NAV of $1.40 today. Still obviously not a great performance.
Also interesting to see that the shares are now trading at a slight discount to NTA.
FOR Price at posting:
$1.37 Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
