Ann: CU2 Global Update , page-4

Oily truly hope you are correct!

Being a businessman can you answer why when we are supposedly managing cu2 global BUT we have given them 155,000,000 shares and lent them money? Strangest thing ever heard of.

History with this company has shown that new projects take control and do whatever they please. Surely there was a better way to put these projects and people into the company making them prove themselves via performance reward.

Your group have previously put people down who have tried to fully inform others of the facts. Why do you see these new projects as 5 to 10 baggers from current levels. Could you please share your insight with all shareholders

An independent on the board is a necessity to look after the interests of the many, many shareholders who are not represented.


IMO DYOR