can only speculate on what coates is thinking, however, if asked, im guessing he's probably b forced to toe the co line.
the question was asked, "how much revenue could tali bring in?" response "the expectation for 2017 & beyond was tens of millions pa".
the q was then put to kirks "so enough to fund the atc trial?" & the previously mentioned response was given. unfortunately their track record doesn't give me to much confidence. I think i recall reading in one of their recent ann's something about them looking at all options to monetise act / np, which I took as code for - we'll sell to the highest bidder to protect our directors fee's...... one of the questions running around in my empty head, if i was tali, why go to kirks? of all the potential business partners, why would you get in to bed with him-couldn't possible be due his track record? like ive said before, I truly believe kirks to be a good man & he certainly means well, however, his ability to produce continually falls well short of the mark.
disappointed would be an understatement that brucey wasn't at the agm.
carn cb what's this all about - Disclosure: Not Held - Sentiment:Sell?? surely this is incorrect as avx shares aren't worth selling!
regards,
dirts
AVX Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
