Cough cough, excuse me VI, PEN has no operating data for the...

Cough cough, excuse me VI, PEN has no operating data for the acid scenario. Their prediction of performance, which requires a long term capital of nearly $500M, is informed by 8 leach tests. That's 1 leach test for every 7M lbs of in-situ resource - good luck with selling that to potential financiers. So potentially (probably in my opinion), the new assumptions and financial metrics are as pie in the sky as those cobbled together by Gus and his management team for Lance Take 1. Why would you assume the new metrics to be more conservative? What basis do you heave for saying this? Do you have the detailed study information to support this wild assumption? Or is out just wishful thinking. All good questions for you to ask Wayne.

Why the sudden desire to trash Gus and his efforts by the way? Not so long ago he was the visionary, the messiah, the uranium guru "with no equal".

A previous poster asked if I had 'serious money' invested. I gave him the choice to decide for himself whether this was serious money or mere pennies. Your assessment is not important.