Ann: Clinical Trial Preliminary Outcomes, page-148

A comment by someone taken from your second post:

"You should perhaps do a more extensive research investigation prior to your dismissal of Dr. Carrick as some sort of quack. He currently has been appointed positions at both Harvard and the University of Cambridge. Some people thought the world was flat and laughed at those who thought it was round. Neuroscience is not a flat and static science; it is dynamic and evolving. Dr. Carrick is a pioneer in neuroscience. You best do some more investigation of your resources prior to trying to insult someone who is working very hard and diligently to assist those with otherwise retractable neurological conditions."

4th link also has numerous comments backing up Carrick Institute, have a see for yourself instead of dismissing the possibility that Carrick's line of neurology actually works. Do more research instead of posting links probably made by journalists to support your argument.

Here's a direct link to the Carrick Insitute's FB page. 4.9/5 stars with 56 reviews.. seems legit:

https://www.facebook.com/pg/CarrickInstitute/reviews/?ref=page_internal