"The reason is simple: Buildings are responsible for about 40...

"The reason is simple: Buildings are responsible for about 40 percent of the greenhouse gases in the US. Those emissions come, in part, from the fossil fuels (primarily natural gas these days but also heating oil) burned to heat (and cool) the water and space inside buildings."

"That means the solution, alongside reducing and eliminating emissions from the electricity sector, is getting all those heating and cooling systems replaced by systems that are hooked up to the grid. In other words: electrification. (Electrify everything!)"

https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2019/3/20/18269356/green-new-deal-building-electrification-states-cities

Whether it is by the generation of renewable energy (or by saving energy through insulation), CPV glass can make a difference.

How much difference?

I can't tell you and I don't think anyone on this forum can either (with any accuracy).

I can tell you however, that there is a demand for anything and everything that will reduce the carbon footprint of large buildings.

That is what CPV is trying to do.

I think we should wait a while before declaring them winners or losers.