I wonder if sell-down of EIG has something to do with this:
"Under post-bid compulsory acquisition a bidder may compulsorily acquire
securities in the bid class on the same terms as under the bid, provided two
threshold tests are met:
(a) the bidder and their associates have relevant interests in at least 90% of
the securities in the bid class at some point during the offer period
(s661A(1)(b)(i)); and
(b) the bidder and their associates have acquired at least 75% of the
securities that the bidder offered to acquire under the bid, whether the
acquisitions happened under the bid or otherwise (s661A(1)(b)(ii))."
Whilst EIG had a shareholding of 12.25%, any prospective acquirer would not be able to compulsorily acquire SXY.
Perhaps EIG have become frustrated with the lack of drilling in FY18 / ID, and their sell-down is a signal that they are open to prospective bidders (hence going just below the 10% blocking stake).
Strange move otherwise...
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Change in substantial holding
I wonder if sell-down of EIG has something to do with this:...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 35 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SXY (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
BTH
BIGTINCAN HOLDINGS LIMITED
David Keane, Co-Founder & CEO
David Keane
Co-Founder & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online