Ann: Change in substantial holding from CGF, page-6

Do not think they are common. Firstlook at volumes they are different.   Each fund had a single sell oneon the 3/3 Green scape  one on 2/15 Challenger  The 0.01% is different because these are the two funds that Greescape holds.          Many of the buys are exactly the same but a careful compare  shows occasionally they vary.   My guess is it is single buys and sells which they then split.   You cannot cut and paste from this document.    You can change it into a PDF several ways.   You then can copy both tables into Excel and run a compare   to find differences.         Then if you are curious you can cut and paste daily price change and volumes    on LYC ASX from Yahoo. Then compare and see if and how the buys and sells affected market.   It is interesting but not sure how important it is.  

What is interesting  is the total price change while these two funds bought almost 14 M shares.   What is also interesting is both just went over the reporting requirment of a  1% increase.   They bought till 2/28 then held just below the 1% reporting requirement.   When price fell they then bought just enough shares    to go over 1% threshold.   If this is a good price why only a few shares to just put them over the one % mark?    Questions I am thinking but have no idea on;  did they plan to sell if stock went up?    Are they hopping to start a rally to sell into by announcing this buy?   They are actively trading this stock. Take a look at Post #: 36937465  and  Post#: 36938207.     We must look at them as active traders not just people that want to accumulate shares.  Compare their trading history to market price and volume  changes.   Once you set it up it takes less than a minute to do.   Write a few macros and you can do it in less than a second.    All unanswered questions but I have a feeling we will know in the future.