Not so much a report but a lot of aaarssse covering comments to...

Not so much a report but a lot of aaarssse covering comments to slow/ quiet down conversation and try and move forward. At least they have placed in writing in one document a repeat of what they have said via individual releases spooned out. Sucking up to TC hmmm


This is interesting
"The earlier clinical work showed great healing of very hard to heal ulcers and we were all excited bythe results including the physicians involved in the clinical studies. But that clinical work was not testedagainst a control group (standard of care) and it is this deficiency in clinical data - and this reason only- that led to the negative outcome of the EU CE Mark process."

So expert physicians were excited as they saw healing . Hmm they wouldn't be interested if it was different to standard of care or were they excited as they were being paid? So if it is all down to SOC those same physicians will have seen similar progress on ulcers due to SOC? That is not what other reports by NHS etc have seen IMO. So does it reflect the only conclusion left that in the real world outside trials the SOC standards are not adhered to by either medical practitioners or patients ? Gee NHS and world governments should pay FTT for our trial as a repair guide of their poor monitoring of their SOC protocols ? So FTT trial has basically proved that protocols of SOC are not adhered to ( patients / physicians) and can be further proven by comparing health data from a subset of patients outside of trial for each country.

Last one - or is there some combined affect of the diligent care and application by ( better than average physicians) nursing care etc and forced attendance at care facility rather than home care etc with other medical monitoring actually has a better outcome for patients. Yep who would have thought that better healthcare of all comorbities would possibly help in resulting care and healing of ulcers? Go figure and no one at FTT or expert panels or any other study has ever quantified that in their due diligence as a factor in trial?