"Many of StatSports PL clients are higher profile and have more expensive players, they are also higher earning football clubs and therefore would have more resources to devote to injury prevention. Yet, they record significantly higher injury rates than CAT teams.
Ultimately, I think this is due to the fact that CAT invests significant amount of time in training football fitness and conditioning coaches on how to read and interpret their data - they often stress this. Where StatsSports is much smaller and under-resourced."
I wonder whether the time invested is training them on interpreting data that only CAT provides (therefore preventing churn), or whether the knowledge imparted could be used with SS products too. In which case, is that the smartest move if it bloats CAT's expenses compared to SS / pushed CFP further down the road?
"Many of StatSports PL clients are higher profile and have more...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CAT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$3.39 |
Change
-0.110(3.14%) |
Mkt cap ! $638.2M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $3.50 | $3.61 | $3.37 | $12.59M | 3.619M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4125 | $3.36 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $3.39 | 9989 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 22/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CAT (ASX) Chart |
