TAM shareholders voted against the MLX proposal because the TAM board promoted the NST HoA as a better deal. Which it may have been if MLX hadn't at that time issued an intention to sue. I know you say that they were obligated to put a better offer to their shareholders but under the terms of their current agreement with MetalsX they were obliged not to. IMHO the agreement that TAM signed with MLX wasn't a great deal for their shareholders and they probably shouldn't have signed it. But it doesn't excuse them just because they decided after the fact that they didn't like it anymore.
TAM shareholders voted against the MLX proposal because the TAM...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add TAM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.8¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $37.60M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.9¢ | 2.9¢ | 2.8¢ | $40.13K | 1.422M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1052557 | 2.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.9¢ | 500000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.13pm 28/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| TAM (ASX) Chart |
