There would definitely be an exclusivity clause(s). MLX are claiming the breach was "collaborative negotiation" - which would infer they believe there was failure to comply with those clauses. If TAM can show that NST's counter-offer was not solicited by them, then so be it. If it was solicited by a third party (which often happens) solely on the basis of publicly known information, then so be it.
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 129 more messages in this thread...
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MLX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
40.5¢ |
Change
0.005(1.25%) |
Mkt cap ! $398.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 40.0¢ | 41.0¢ | 39.5¢ | $784.4K | 1.951M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 44650 | 40.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 41.0¢ | 147646 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 29/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MLX (ASX) Chart |
