Ann: CAT H1 FY19 Results Presentation, page-55

High profile or not, I suspect some shareholders in this forum, and some in athlete performance management, may consider Catapult's loss of the FFA contract [ Socceroos, Matilda's & all national teams], as reasonably significant; as would losing/not winning US Soccer, The Brazillian & Chinese Football Association deals, the Irish, South African & Argentine Rugby and NZ super rugby teams be considered reasonably significant. 

RWC1, I see you post a BUY sentiment but are not a shareholder, so wonder why you bother to contribute here but do not buy the shares??? --especially curious when you post that the National Football teams are not high profile clients to retain and the justification stated is "that people hardly bother to watch them" - which is not relevant to retaining clients [which I'm sure Catapult would have wanted] and is clearly wrong anyway. 

The Socceroos and Matilda's (with their # 6 2019 World Cup ranking) are fairly high profile in this part of the world [Catapult home territory], AND most importantly they are now paying clients which Catapult no longer have as their clients. Q- [is that 1 client or 7 teams in determining churn %?] 

Perhaps someone in this forum can ask Catapult management why they are not winning these deals? - and post the results!  It won't be me!   
 
In the meantime and on the subject of high profile clients  "Go Egyptian Pyramids FC"!