Well, it would be instructive I think to compare the Bryah in terms of both strike kilometres of the prospective horizon (considering the folding in the east and western margins, and up around BYH's Mars/Saturn) and areal extent in square klicks, or any combination thereof, with say, the Tasmanian VHMS basin or even the Pilbara, and come to your own conclusions as to whether the Bryah really is that much more endowed.
I mean, more copper and gold has come out of MT Morgans or Hellyer than DeGrussa. Plus there's multiple VHMSs, and in the Bryah you have....3. Being generous to Monty. Not counting Forrest or Wodger, because of ambiguities. 4 if you consider Yarlarweelor a barren VMS chert horizon what happily contains later epigenetic gold. And so on and so forth can we parse the mineralisation into clades and categories.
So yeah, Mr Simich's job is to blow his own trumpet. He's pretty good at it unless it gets punched out of him
Dr Hawke's work, which I've read, was a useful contribution to the scientific literature. But, as I said, if you put the causative actions of the people and company against the subsequent events of the Bryah basin VHMS rush, it is absolutely clear to anyone who can follow cause and effect, that Dr Hawke did not knowingly discover DeGrussa with any anticipation of doing so (ie; accidental), and SFR did not knowingly drill the hole with any anticipation of discovering a VHMS, and every single thing subsequent to that felicitous event does not, in reality, show that SFR or Dr Hawke have any great advantage in knowledge and science over any other company.
If they did, their near on 1.5M metres of AC drilling would surely have proved Mr Simich's assertion and discovered several DeGrussas, and done so cheaply, repeatedly and easily. The reality is that SFR merely has a giant budget and cash flow to outlast its neighbours, and is now deplying that capital on its neighbours, with little result.
But, you know, in 2 weeks I could be wrong when they blitz into the next big thing.
