Ann: Board Changes, page-102

No I didn't contradict myself. And I'm beginning to sound like a broken record. So unless you have something else to add I'll leave you with this.

Say you do this. You get your 5%. You call the meeting. I ask you this.

1. For what purpose?
2. What's the value in said purpose?
3. How you going to get the last 46% needed to pass the purpose?
4. How can you justify the diversion of money/ resources at a time like this? These things are not free and BOD have better things to focus on.
5. Would said voting bloc have any other objectives? If so what's the value and likely chance of success?

I have given my reasons for the against multiple times. No one has corrected me or given me a reason to change my mind. I'm not one for doing something for the sake of doing something. I'll pick my battles and make sure it has at least a snowball's chance in hell of succeeding. Calling this meeting is not going add any transparency. It's the character of the BOD and also the ASX rules that decide what gets released.

Like I have said, No one is stopping you from doing this. But unless you can answer the above, I will not support it and will tell you that's it is a waste of time. We are both entitled to our opinions. As we are both shareholders both are valid. But not once have you presented an argument for your side. I never have seen the value in calling for a meeting that has no chance of success.