Nht, I would love for there to be transparency from all parties involved. I think you misunderstood me in that. But it comes down to the character of the BOD to what they release.
5% isn't enough. We would need a huge amount. At least 20%-25% but higher the better. Which means top shareholders.
What I'm trying to say is to organise this is a lot of effort. Will no clear benefits. I have been watching HDY's efforts. And I have seen no results. They don't have a deciding vote. The ASX and BOD are not telling them anything new. They decided a new board without the power to elect them or even remove the old one. They are in the exact same position. All they can do is call for a spill of the board. It must be quite frustrating.
Do not forget every shareholder has a voice already. I'm pretty sure most of us in both companies used it at the last shareholder meeting. The outcome was 90% in favour of all resolutions. In other words combined or individual our voices were not enough.
More importantly as well, with a new BOD, I see even less reason at the moment to go down that track. For the moment these guys are making the right moves.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Board Changes
Nht, I would love for there to be transparency from all parties...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 71 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add VIC (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
ACW
ACTINOGEN MEDICAL LIMITED
Will Souter, CFO
Will Souter
CFO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online