Probably a typo in their announcement.
The highlights refers to assay results of up to 10.5g/t while the table below reports ppm. Even the description prior to the table reports 5 samples returned assays of greater than 1g/t.
While there are some promising samples they need a lot more to prove up the project....they want to find 3 years worth of ore. Going to need a lot more that just a few rock piles. If tailings are consistency above 1g/t they will probably have some easy $$$ to make from them...providing recovery rates are good.
SK definately looks promising but much more of the story to be told over the next 6 months.
On drilling in SK. Has snow and ice got anything to do with the lack of recent drilling?
Probably a typo in their announcement. The highlights refers to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
