Because substantial holder is for >5% shareholding? Van Eck has always held RMS at around 3%. This change just tipped it over 5%. I think they only needed to report difference from their last notice which is when they dropped out of 5%.
Because substantial holder is for >5% shareholding? Van Eck has...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RMS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.98 |
Change
0.030(1.54%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.514B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $2.01 | $2.02 | $1.96 | $6.338M | 3.200M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 55455 | $1.98 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.99 | 32563 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 15/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RMS (ASX) Chart |
