Ann: Bauer-19 and Stunsail-1 update, page-16

Thanks Spec.

I was actually referring to the wells in the Santos SACB slide you put up in your first post. Wasn't sure that the SACB wells were producing better than the Nap Trough when comparing how fracs (and in which zones). I should probably find this myself, but thought you might have know given your detailed posts.

One more question - what are your thoughts on the heading on slide 62, "Wells strategically located to delineate acreage for retention and exploration purposes". The 855 program seemed intentionally conservative - a long cry from the heavily fracced Halifax-1 which seemed to catch the drilling team off guard with higher temp influxes resulting in… something inconclusive (as you say).

Was this purely "staking the borders" and any good flows were going to be a bonus?

What are your thoughts on Reg's words : "A targeted campaign of fracture stimulation was undertaken to increase the understanding and knowledge of the geology and optimal approach for gas extraction. As such, flow rates to date should be assessed in this context and are not representative of whole-of-well rates expected from an entire commercially producing well."