WHY are some posters directing s/h back to issues/bonuses of WL,...

WHY are some posters directing s/h back to issues/bonuses of WL, when he has left the company?
Misdirection?
Why talk about historical issues relating to a bonus paid to WL, when he is nowhere to be seen in the re-entry to Aust, or to the entry into Canada, when he is not even a director or employee now?
What has his prior bonuses got to do with an entry to Canada?
Just keep talking it down.
That's the way.
Some posters Still claiming "Held" I see.
What a genuine shareholder would do if that "bonus" concern was genuine, would be to contact the company and try to understand what the current situation is regarding bonuses - given that WL has left, and I suspect the criteria wrt to bonuses has completely changed.
I really believe that genuine shareholders of YOW should take great care when absorbing some of these posts on HC. Claimed "retail experts" may well have an agenda which could be at odds with other shareholders.