That's a rather disingenuous figure to be throwing around. I'd rather pay $130/(kg/annum) to build a mine that operates for fifty years than $130/(kg/annum) to build a mine that operates for five. Especially if the expected timeframe for payback is about five years (per the BFS).
Or, to put it another way, that figure does not take into account the expected mine life (26 years, likely to be higher given that they've only proven out the most profitable part of the resource - per the BFS, "only 22% of the Total Ngualla Mineral Resource estimate".) Granted that it's not as simple as dividing through by the expected mine life, given that there is a time factor associated with the cost of finance, but even so.
(Unless I'm misinterpreting what you mean by that figure, but it's too close to what I get from dividing the capex by the expected annual production of NdPr for me to think that's likely. Feel free to correct me if I'm misunderstanding.)
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: ASX Release Land Agreement Teeside
That's a rather disingenuous figure to be throwing around. I'd...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PEK (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
12.0¢ |
Change
0.005(4.35%) |
Mkt cap ! $51.95M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
11.5¢ | 12.0¢ | 11.5¢ | $51.12K | 431.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 423108 | 11.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
12.0¢ | 357248 | 4 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 120399 | 0.029 |
1 | 150000 | 0.028 |
3 | 1120000 | 0.027 |
1 | 200000 | 0.026 |
1 | 80000 | 0.025 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.031 | 169346 | 2 |
0.032 | 280000 | 2 |
0.033 | 685000 | 2 |
0.034 | 600000 | 1 |
0.035 | 300000 | 1 |
Last trade - 10.53am 04/12/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
PEK (ASX) Chart |