Share
699 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 133
clock Created with Sketch.
06/08/18
21:27
Share
Originally posted by plough
↑
"My only initial concern is the hole MO-A4-004D only hit copper on the NPF contact and nothing at the same depth of MO-A4-003D! I see they are inferring a fault to explain this. Just sows some small doubt around continuity perhaps??"
I feel The fault runs transverse to the strike so doubt continuity is an issue .
Its interesting though to get my mind around the size of the ore body , as when looking at the diagram it is a cross section of the ore body width but with a dimension in meters similar to a long section for strike that most mines have .
Multiply that wide width by a strike length that could end up being 2 kilometers and an RL that could go down two hundred meters below 100 meters of overburden and there is potentially a replicated T3 pit.
While most juniors admittedly of 1/5 the market cap are happy with an 8 Million tonne resource to opencut mine this province to MOD had the potential to be thirty times that and depth of the ore body below surface becomes less of an issue with strip ratio for open cast mining with the wide intercepts and potentially long strike compared to the smaller resources most juniors have .
Expand
Hi Geenius,
All we know is that we are 'awaiting assays' on hole 004.
It's ofc hard for us to see what oo4 has hit but it looks to me (see pic) like it's almost bound to have hit mineralisation within the fault zone.
I wouldn't be surprised to hear some positive news from 004. Meanwhile they're showing great confidence in A4 by drilling hole 5 where the fault tracks deeper.
Let's see what those assays say!