ADV 0.00% 13.0¢ ardiden ltd

Respectfully, @Mosb, I disagree with several statements in this...

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 927 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 72
    Respectfully, @Mosb, I disagree with several statements in this and other posts you have made in the last day or so.

    1) "Anyone can post on and recount where it has traded to each day and that's all you have done"

    ....that is not right. @mattyedw, myself, u38 et al have posted a lot about the vacuous nature of the upramp a few months back where simple maths will tell you a bunch of people got badly burned, pretty much for nothing. I think it peaked at about 3.7c. Whether it's correlated or not (I suspect so) there seems to have been a consensus that the SP would find a floor around 1.5c, which it did. I had personally planned to re-enter, but the LSI and sense of deja vu about their recent string of announcements has given me pause. But Mattyedw has picked it almost every time, before the price drop. You might not like what his crystal ball is saying, but he hasn't been far off the mark.

    2) "When they call you out on it you disappear for a day or two and then come back"

    .....I can't recall this happening. Could you point to an example (or several, as you have alluded to)?

    3) "almost everyone and anyone is 35-50% off their highs in Jan"

    ....I have shares in two lithium miners and another lithium play and none of them are within your range (that is, they're down by less than 35%). Nor is ADV, who is off the other end of your range at 65% off its high of 3.7c.

    4) "they have taken steps to fix the mistakes of the past and that is all shareholders can ask for"

    ....not necessarily an error on your part, but while the general read of posters here is that this geo team is definitely a good unit, I haven't seen any evidence that the previous geo team was a bad one. It's not necessarily fixing a mistake, though it definitely affords the company the opportunity to blame someone other than themselves, at least until this geo team have completed their sweep.

    5) "do you think guys like this take on work with companies like ADV if there is no decent prospects of finding any decent results? No, I don't think so"

    .....You will have to explain this to me. I would have thought the purpose of employing a geo team is to help determine if there something there to mine, and where it might be, not to wait until there is a guaranteed strike of lithium just waiting to be mapped, then agreeing to accept paid work to find it? Do geo teams get a percentage of what they find, or do they just get paid for the work, regardless of their success?

    6) "Once again you post with such negativity but without any actual substance"

    ....with respect, Mosb, Mattyedw is expressing negativity towards ADV. You, however, have spent most of your last few posts expressing negativity towards Mattyedw. If you think his opinion stinks, do please address the issues he raises. I for one would be stoked to be shown something by you to get excited over, or something that Mattyedw or the like has said that is totally wrong. But just coming on here bashing another poster because you don't like their sentiment, rather than taking on their content, is kind of pointless.

    7) "No one comes to HC to post without an agenda - here you are claiming to be a truly selfless altruistic messiah of sorts - here to save us from the evil of this investment for nothing at all in return."

    (i).....is that so hard to fathom? I tried to point out the lack of new news surrounding the last pump to try and help out. If you saw something you thought smelled a bit, or was out of place, are you telling me you would deliberately keep it to yourself, all the time, and let others get sucked in?

    (ii)....you believe that everybody who posts on HC has an agenda, and without proof have labelled Mattyedw's contributions as pure downramping to generate his own buy-in discount. Given that's the case, and that you obviously have an agenda (which we know via your unsolicited confession), then what is it? "Wanting to learn" is not an agenda. Can we also measure you by your own yardstick and presume that your regular appearances attacking ADV-pessimists and promoting the stock's future is to feather your own nest with an upramp, rather than any altruistic endeavour? Or perhaps not everyone who posts to Hot Copper has an "agenda" agenda?

    Finally, if it is true that Mattyedw is "a simple day trader who is trying his best to march the SP down to his entry point", then I really have to take my hat off to him for his spadework. Talk about laying the foundations months out from a single pip trade! A bit hard to swallow that, as a vicious and bloodthirsty bottomfeeding day-trader, he would actually tell you where his entry point is?

    GLTAH
    Last edited by Treefern: 20/04/18
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add ADV (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
13.0¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $8.439M
Open High Low Value Volume
13.0¢ 13.0¢ 13.0¢ $8 58

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 26918 13.0¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
14.0¢ 71428 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 14.54pm 29/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
ADV (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.