Ann: Appointment of New Company Secretary , page-12

RB,

Which part of your Nostradamus-like prediction of a change in company secretary and that the CEO remains in the position was "past" when you first made your post on HC a week or so ago?

This is a new announcement and is now in the past, as are all of the "facts". Anything in the future is conjecture.

Seriously, RB, you should read your posts as someone else might. A short revisit of your posts by anyone may make them look in the very near term rear vision mirror and be shocked by what they find. A longer term rear view might be the reason there's no serious money here.

Here's a brief summary, since you've been posting, of things that were in the future at that time (not necessarily in chronological order);

1) Some shareholders buy up shares with alleged inside information provided by the board.

2) Auditors accuse directors of criminal actions including "creating a false market" - see point 1.

3) ASIC investigates company - details not released, See point 2.

4) The ENTIRE independent board of NuSep resigns, hours before the AGM. A poster on HC claims that the board, or parts thereof have acted illegally by sacking the independent directors. The poster later enters into a semantic argument about the word "sacked", while not really standing explicitly by the original statement. See points 2. & 3.

5) A HC poster says they'll ask the tough questions at the AGM. Hours before they renege on the promise (that is a clincher for me as far as that posters credibility)

6) CEO says that the poster who suggested the board was sacked should be "brought to task" and effectively calls that HC poster a liar by categorically denying any coercion from the board.

7) SALARIES, reflecting in excess of 100% of the cash the company has and more than 100% of the sales continue to be paid, mostly to the directors of the company.

8) Meanwhile, on HC, many call for forgetting the past as the past, and the bull spit continues.

9) Poster such as myself (and other kindred spirits with vision) are hounded as the culprits....Hitler and Stalin killed people for what they said.

All this should have been within your Nostradamus-like purview. I am sure it was. So why don't you give us some actual facts that will happen in the future, as opposed to the "something will happen in the future" type post?

Mate, your posts are just seeming like flatulent pollywaffle. Can't you give us something of substance (Definition of substance: That which is solid and practical in character, quality, or importance - just in case you are unsure)?