Ann: Appendix 4E and 2018 Annual Report, page-45

"...just thinking along the same lines when you last pulled me up for thinking along these lines"

Oh, yes, I recall; when you took great umbrage at the company's strategy for Liddell... despite you acknowledging that you hadn't looked at the Liddell case in any detail.

When a public company has an asset that has, by industry standards, become outdated; and when the management of that company deems it prudent to shutter in that asset because it has exceeded its useful operating life and is becoming too unreliable and too expensive to operate and - importantly, management's plan is to replace the capacity of that asset with new, modern, and far more environmentally-friendly capacity.... you think there is something untoward about all that?